|
課程名稱 |
西洋政治思想專題
Seminar on Selected Topics in Western Political Thought |
|
開課學期 |
111-2 |
|
授課對象 |
社會科學院 政治學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
蕭高彥 |
|
課號 |
PS7012 |
|
課程識別碼 |
322 M4020 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
2.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期五3,4(10:20~12:10) |
|
上課地點 |
社科研605 |
|
備註 |
碩班必修：政治思想。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限：20人
外系人數限制：5人 |
|
|
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
本學期課程設計的主軸是「現代國際政治思想」（political thought of modern international politics），將研討格勞秀斯（H. Grotius）、霍布斯（T. Hobbes）、瓦特爾（E. Vattel），以及惠頓（H. Wheaton）等理論家。除了精讀原典，本課程將搭配相關的重要二手文獻，討論國際政治思想中的格勞秀斯傳統與霍布斯傳統，以促進理解與討論。 |
|
課程目標 |
本課程目標在於訓練同學熟悉西方現代政治思想研究之發展以及比較政治思想的趨勢，並培養獨立研究能力。 |
|
課程要求 |
課程要求
1) 輪流報告教材（報告需準備大綱，時間以二十分鐘為原則）。
2) 閱讀教材，每次上課準備問題提出討論。
3) 就本學期授課內容撰寫學期報告一篇，於7/31前email寄給老師（carl@gate.sinica.edu.tw），逾時不候。
指定閱讀
Hugo Grotius, On the Law of War and Peace, tran. F. W. Kelsey. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1925. (舊譯本：Hugo Grotius, The Rights of War and Peace, 3vols, ed. R. Tuck, from the edition by Jean
Barbeyrac. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005)
Thomas Hobbes, On the Citizen, eds. & tran. R. Tuck and M. Silverthorne Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998.
Emer de Vattel, Law of Nations or The Principles of Natural Law Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns, tran. C. G. Fenwick, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1916.
Henry Wheaton, Elements of International Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936.
參考書目﹕
Carl Schmitt, The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, New York: Telos Press, 2003
Richard Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Jennifer Pitts, Boundaries of the International: Law and Empire, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 2018 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
另約時間 備註： 面談時間﹕請事前口頭預約，或以email預約時間: carl@gate.sinica.edu.tw |
|
指定閱讀 |
上課進度：
2/24 導論
3/3 排定報告班表
Grotius, On the Law of War and Peace, Prolegomena, pp.9-30; Bk.1, Chapter I-II.I, pp. 31-54.
3/10 Grotius, On the Law of War and Peace, Bk.1, Chapter. III.VI-XX, pp. 101-130; Bk.II, Chapter I-III.IV, pp.169-207.
3/17 Grotius, On the Law of War and Peace, Bk.1, Chapter III.I-II, IV, pp.91-92, 97-98; Bk.II, Chapters V選. pp. 231, 234, 249-259,
Chapter XX.I-IX pp.462-478; Bk.II, Chapter XX.XXXVII-XLIV, pp.502-508; Bk.II, Chapter XX.XLVIII-XLIV, pp.516-518;
Chapter XXIII.xiii (pp.565-566), Bk.III, Chapter I.I-IV, pp.599-601; Chapter III.I-V (pp.630-633), Chapter VIII, pp.697-700;
Chapter XXV, pp.860-862.
3/24 Hobbes, On the Citizens, ed. R. Tuck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, Dedication, Preface, Chapters 1-3, pp. 3-57.
3/31 Hobbes, On the Citizens, Chapters 5-10, pp. 69-126
4/7 Hobbes, On the Citizens, Chapters 12-15, pp.131-186.
4/14 【期中考週】
4/21 Vattel, Law of Nations, Preface, pp.3a-13a; Introduction, Bk.1, Chapter 1-4, pp.3-27; Chapter 6-8, 12, pp. 34-43, 53-67.
4/28 Vattel, Law of Nations, Bk.2, Chapter 1-5, pp. 113-135, Chapter 18, pp.222-232 Bk.3, Chapter 1, 3, 4, 21-23, pp. 235-236, 243-258, 302-312, Bk. 4, Chapter 1, pp.343-345.
5/5 Henry Wheaton, Elements of International Law, Chapter 1-2, §1-§28, 1866 ed. pp.3-35; 75-78 (試著比較1st ed. (1836) 相同章節, pp. 35-56, etc).
5/12 Travers Twiss, “Introduction to the Second Edition,” The Law of Nation Considered as Independent Political Communities, Oxford, 1884, pp.xvii-xliii.
John Westlake, “The Principles of International Law,” Chapters on the Principles of International Law, Cambridge, 1894, pp.78-85.
5/19 Carl Schmitt, The Nomos of the Earth, Part 3, Chapter 1-3, pp.140-184.
5/26 H. Lauterpacht, “The Grotian Tradition in International Law,” British Yearbook of International Law, 23:1-53 (1946)
6/2 H. Bull, “Hobbes and the International Anarchy,” Social Research, 48:4, pp. 717-738 (1981)
6/9 【期末考週】修課同學學期報告構想討論，需討論相關文獻，並準備書面大綱。
|
|
參考書目 |
HOW TO WRITE A SCHOLARLY PAPER
1. State an explicit thesis. A good paper should state a distinctive thesis at the very beginning and indicate why it is important. In this fashion you grab the reader's attention before it has a chance to wonder and make the paper effective. If you do not know your point at the beginning of your paper, you will not fortuitously discover it as you wander aimless along.
2. What is meant by a "thesis." A thesis is your opinion on certain issue(s) that can be related to the ongoing debates or concerns, or new interpretation of the text that can enhance of our understanding. A thesis must be situated in the current state of second-hand literature of the relevant philosophers. Stating that you intend to "compare and contrast" several authors on a broad range of issues is not a thesis, nor a simple stream of data, nor a mere stream of consciousness.
3. Argument: your thesis must be substantiated by relevant textual evidence. Through the middle of your paper you must convince your reader that your thesis is plausible. To do so you have to prove your command of the texts.
4. Economy: marshall only relevant material. The person with the greatest command of the material will know what is obvious and can merely be stated, and what needs to be argued. Avoid stating the obvious as well as merely stringing together summaries of text arbitrarily. Everything should follow in a logical order to support your thesis.
5. Analyze the implications or relevance of your thesis. In conclusion you should answer such questions as "so what?" "why is this interesting?" A mere recapitulation or summary at the end of a short essay insults the reader's power of memory. Your conclusion should provide something fresh and new.
6. Clarity is the highest virtue. It is not your reader's responsibility to try to reconstruct what you mean, or to ferret out the subterranean logic that binds together the parts of your essay. Write in such a way that no one could possibly doubt what your are trying to say or why you are saying it.
7. Addressee. Write as if your audience were the world at large. Never write as if your paper were a privileged communication between you and the professor. Avoid casual speech and chattiness on the one hand and stilted formality on the other. Write as you would speak.
8. Revise and revise again. There is no other way for your essay to show that it is the product of care than by doing more than one draft. You expect your reader to take your work seriously and give it care and attention. It is an insult to the reader not to do the same.
9. Learning by doing. Copy several papers from scholarly journals on a subject that interests you and examine how the authors execute the above principles. |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
|